May 25 2023: Tactical Response Update Discussion

What could it be? A Nimbus 2000 Dart-stick?

2 Likes

A new rocket type for the RPG-7.

1 Like

Ok… that is super weird

An explosive arrow?
Also looks like a drone, but its 1990 and not the 2020´s .

1 Like

Explosive Lawn darts

1 Like

I was hoping for an explosive javelin like in Mad Max; something easier to target than a grenade and maybe perk up the throwing skills a bit.

1 Like

Another micro-dlc?

:face_with_raised_eyebrow:

:chart_with_downwards_trend:

7 Likes

You don’t even know about it’s contents, don’t be so quick to judge.

3 Likes

I do know every other micro dlc they have released though. Pretty easy line to follow.

Even if they released a high quality micro-dlc, which history says they will not, it is still yet another micro-dlc tacked onto a game floundering from their weight. No idea why they continue to release more and more when a lot of what they have is broken in one way or another.

At some point half the actual game will be straight DLC. Fate of every APEX game I guess.
:chart_with_downwards_trend:

6 Likes

Let’s wait to see what’s in this pack before rating it. :muscle: It may be something even cooler than other small DLC

3 Likes

You did notice that only part of the update is a DLC (Tactical equipment)? The mission, performance and QOL parts are not. :sunglasses:

Yes, I read the letter.

1 Like

Then why are you still playing?
NOTHING IS PERFECT

And isn’t there some beauty in it?
Just think about hilarious bugs in all your Games you played and were able to abuse and experience before they disappeared.

Also programming is trial and error and the fanbase of a Game has ALWAYS people that crave content no matter if its 100% working or not.
Be gratefull for that the Devs are even listening to this awsome Community :wink: and trying to fullfill everyone’s wishes.

If you dont like it dont use it.

2 Likes

I do not play it.

Yeah.

Think about all the gamebreaking bugs and performance issues that took them years to fix. And the ones that have not disappeared yet.

They are fulfilling peoples wishes in ways that are easy and make them money. If thye actually listened they would fix the multiple DLC’s they have out, instead they make more and add more bugs.

I don’t and won’t. Them taking time for yet another micro-dlc is time they could use to, at mininum, fix the issues their other packs have.

8 Likes

Then why are you here? :eyes:
Please dont take this the wrong way but if you complain about a game and its devs for the content without playing it, it feels more like a bad review. (this forum is not the right place for that)

3 Likes

To give feedback on the game so they can improve it.

I have played it, a lot.

No.

4 Likes

As far as I know there are different departments for development of new content and bugfixing.

And there will be a list of priorities, major and minor issues.

And I bet that they focus on solving the major issues instead of solving the smallest and maybe fastest ones. Otherwise you, or wait, you don’t even play the game, others would complain that they just fix useless stuff while the gamebreaking bugs aren’t touched.

They do the very best they can to give us the best experience. The game was announced as an evolving one with continious content updates, inspired even by the communities input. That’s what we have and what we get. And of course not everything’s for free, but just low prices. And nothing is necessary to play the game. It’s not even a competive game with something like pay to win. It’s just for joy.

I don’t know what to say more. Like it or leave it, but don’t spread your hate.

So are you saying we are not allowed to say when we don’t like a new addition? (Like rn where he says he does not like more micro dlc?) Because afaik it’s allowed to disagree with stuff and discuss it.

4 Likes

yeah, but the ones who make new dlc could for sure go back and improve the dlc they made.

IDK, constant crashing, and bases getting vaporised seems kinda big to me.

Irrelevant, but I do mayvbe once a month, only for it to crash.

debatable

Price is relative. I’d consider the DLC’s well priced if they were up to the quality of the base game.

Time spent on DLC is time not spent on the base game, which still needs work.

The game is built on community feedback, but if my feedback is not positive, or at least neutral, I should leave?

Also no, seeing devdefense is funny.

Saying that the dlc is low quality nad a bad direction for the game = hate.

8 Likes

You’re right. That’s not what I wanted to say.
But if I don’t like a game, any update that arrives, what the devs to with the game… And if I don’t even play the game… Why should I stay and talk bad words about it?

I would throw it into the edge and focus on other games that fulfil my expectations.

Critics are good, welcome and needed to improve the results. Hate speech isn’t critics.
And that’s what it often sounds like…

3 Likes

… Talking about a dlc that isn’t yet released.

Hey, I agree that not everything was perfect.
There are many things I’d like to be improved…or fixed. But that’s nothing that destroys the game for me.

Agreed, but these are things they’ve been working on according to Carni’s letter.

And crashes may have reasons in numerous edges. Different hardware, different systems, and millions of coding lines. I have no issues with fps or crashes. What now? It isn’t like “oh, that happens, then we have to pull this trigger that it will not happen any more”.

I’d bet that this is no decision a dev may take by himself. In some eyes (those who pay the devs) it could be wasted time…