All “No” options are about increasing the capacity. Also, why create biased poll in the first place? 
You are the “biased” part over here.
There is the option that everything is fine for each of the 3 categories.
My only mistake was about the NO, when in fact it´s 1 NO for “not changing”, and 2 YES to “not changing”
If you want a Poll about reducing weight capacity, you can make one and propose your specific request.
I wasn’t the one who created biased poll. You were.
All i asked for, was a better, unbiased poll. So, those who think Plundra has more storage than needed, can voice their opinion as well.
Currently, you have all those grouped to the “it’s fine” category, giving skewed results.
Now you can!
And i doubt anyone wants to reduce the crafting station
And being out of this “topic” makes it reachable to more people.
I will delete the remaining 2 comments after 15 m for this to stay clean.
Discussion moved here to keep the source topic on-point.
//Mod
No need to delete since it can remain in here.
And this alone is to keep 3rd poll biased?
Just because you want more storage, doesn’t mean that no-one else (except me), aren’t willing to have reduced storage. And without proper voting option, we’ll never know if there are others as well.
Are you out of your mind?
Is this how a moderator should behave?
Are you telling me that i can not reply into the forums as a regular user? That because of my moderator status, i have to agree with all that is said in the forums and i can never-ever reply as a regular user? 
Btw, i’m asking for equality. I guess it’s a tough pill to swallow.
I´m telling you whenever anyone wants to change something you usually step in Like a Soviet commander, like you are afraid the devs will change everything.
It´s a regular behavior of yours.
Some users which i will not identify had previously talked to me about this issue
Can you please Delete my Storage capacity Topic then?
I already copied it and added another 2 NON bias options.
If the options were not available is because Most people are fine with it, very few people desire to have reduced weight.
But of course let´s wait for what the Future Poll will do
Please delete that Topic, a perfect and improved one is waiting
There is no need to delete. You can edit it. While you can’t edit the poll itself, you can delete the 3rd poll entirely and add new one in, with equal options.
After some trial and error it´s finally done.
But the full delete request would have been more efficient and less time consuming.
1 Like
That error says that you can’t edit the poll after 5mins of it’s creation. But since you included 3 different polls in it, you should be able to delete one of them completely. And then, add in another, new one.
By the looks of it, you got hang of it. 
Nice to see equal polls, even when people may never pick one or another option. But having an option is what matters.
Oh, that topic/poll too, for anyone else who happens to read this dispute: Storage Capacity POLL
So a shoulder version should be easy, right? If Vulcan Raven can, why not GZ?
I haven’t seen another topic about this and I think it fits perfectly here, so what do you people think of the presence of foreign soldiers in the game? The description of the “Reaction: Phase 1” operation, described in the new weapon dlc can support this. We may have other survivors roaming the fields, this was questioned in the latest survey promoted by the developers. It would be great to watch different groups go into battle against the machines, perhaps even human factions fighting each other for power after the machines were defeated. People can be stupid at that point.
Here you go: Russian troop topic
Btw, this topic serves the purpose of cleaning up other topics from off-topic replies, without deleting the off-topic chatter. And while the moved discussion can continue on in this topic, the intent of this topic isn’t about starting new discussions in it.
//Mod
Trust me I’m aware the latest official opinion is a hard pass I’m not saying things in adverse to that.
I’d say more than the plundra has been major, inventory, crafting, melee weapons, explosives nerf, and lately vehicle damage nerf. all of those are incredibly game changing, and there’s more you could add to that list that would be hard to describe as minor but wouldn’t be full on major.
I wouldn’t miss fast travel myself, never fancied it much in the first place. There’s a reason why i have a few million kilometers clocked in game, and its not just to find new views to make content with 
i don’t think vehicles would omit the plundra, quite the opposite, i believe GZ would benefit from multiple forms of player storage. in prospect of future additions weapons wise, equipment wise, gameplay wise (offered feature of crafting “stat boosters” etc) with crafting also on the rise in game thats a place where storage is desperately needed moving forwards, and having a mobile cache to store those resources would be immensely helpful. the amount of steel you need in game for apparel crafting and munitions crafting is massive, and in your crafting bench and even a mule character you dont even scratch the surface (if you want full 5c sets of gear, which i myself do and im sure many others)
now the hardware load is a fair argument, but imo gz should put a “final” version for the older console gens, and only update those with major DLC that add to the story, and nothing else. (i know a spicy opinion) but i think moving forwards that would be the most liberating thing gz could do. focus on the new console gens and pc for content updates. now this would require a transitory phase etc and thats stuff thats entirely off topic here, but yeah just my thoughts on the limitations older console gens impose.
To back up what tene said about storage, all the people that are complaining that we dont have enough storage already, will deffinatelly hold that opinion if you take away plundra.
Also, the idea for cars, at least, the maine idea, is, you have a mini plundra, not as much storage as in safe houses, but enough to make some amount of sence for a car trunk. Then, its kind of a high risk high reward type thing, where if the car blows up you either loose what was in it, or you can only have a majorly reduced amount.
Just regarding the
We might love the game, but it still has a lot of major bugs and issues, it´s almost 2 years old and half of the map is not revamped “updated”.
The remaining DLC´s are still many months away (and some might need more time).
The new consoles transition has been a flop due to low production, economic problems and scalpers.
This is off topic, although devs are the ones who decide, focusing only on PC and New gen before “finishing” the game would be wrong.
Yes the game is compatible to new systems, but at least they should finish the game before finally advancing.
That is all I have to say, and won´t even comment with the mess this topic has become 
.
2 Likes
Why cant something else be added, like a smarter AI, or a new bot?
I really don’t think anybody would complain about it, and a lot of people are saying a new robot should be added anyway, and even posted some great ideas about them.